![]() I truly hope Capcom sees the money on the table and picks it up. A kid looking at a video of something that looks like the in between of Botw and Mario with robots and charming characters like the Servbots and Kattleox residents would be a SMASH hit compared to a 2.5D platformer that doesn't even look half as good as indie offerings with more content that existed at the time of MM11s release, like Hollow Knight. Look at how well Genshin, a sequel in the impact franchise that was a niche of a niche of a niche, ended up doing with how it reminded people of BOTW. A game that looks like a faster paced take on Breath of the Wild with Megaman Legends charm is PERFECT for the current gaming landscape. Megaman is niche but he also got a spot on the Smash roster and a massive publicity boost with Battle Network Legacy. There is literally no better way for Capcom to get huge in the public eye than to just reintroduce the general population to the Servbots. The potential to snatch the young Nintendo crowd with a fixed modern version of what they have solidified would work WONDERS for Capcom in terms of both profit and merchandising. Take inspiration from Kingdom Hearts for visuals and they literally have a multi million seller. ![]() They can get the monster hunter and Street Fighter team to aid in enemy design to make the gameplay pop like they clearly did with RE4R. Heck, just making circle a souls like dodge button alone drastically opens up the combat. You really think in the age of BOTW and Elden Ring that a well made, high effort open world 3rd person shooter platformer hybrid would sell poorly? Absolutely not.Īnd besides, RE Engine is perfectly capable of making things without murdering a resource budget with all the assets they can reuse and how simple it would be to make things in that art style. Actually most differences between them are like that. One has emphasis on projectiles and the other on close combat, and even than that is a shallow practical distinction. ![]() Legends of Mega Man and Zelda though, legitimately play like eachother. ![]() People who say it is a Pokemon knockoff really have very little basis for that claim and are often people who just want to smear with disrespect. Those two games have radically different game designs and what you get from one cannot be interchanged with the other. I know Battle Network will come up as justification, but the difference is, Battle Network isn't actually like Pokemon at all. Even if it did, it might bomb commercially, cause I can see it now, everybody and thier cat will be comparing it to Zelda (an impossible standard, becuase Zelda has this culture of prestige ingrained in its massive influence), making it come off as a knockoff and trend chaser. Would probably be the best game in existance to me, even irrespective of how I feel about the lore and story. I will say this tho, let's say Capcom makes a new Legends, and it is up to the quality of Breath of the Wild but with maybe better combat. ![]() It can get a 4th chance and that's fine, I wouldn't be angry about that, but I just would rather the other ones get updated more. Legends is just bland to me, and not that engaging. But I will not lie to you and say I don't like the gameplay loop, aesthetics, music, story etc etc of the other games more. I am not actively hating on Legends, it has some. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |